Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:52:29 +0200 | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 29 | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > The powerpc allyesconfig build still fails today. > > Changes since 20110826: > > New tree: iommu > > Dropped tree: iommu (build failure) > > Linus' tree gained build failures for which I applied 2 patches. > > The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. > > The scsi tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from > next-20110826. > > The net tree lost 2 conflicts. > > The iommu tree gained a build failure so I dropped it. > > I have still reverted the x86/spinlocks branch from the tip tree for > today. > > The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > The tty tree lost its build failure. > > The moduleh tree lost 2 conflicts. > > The akpm tree gained conflicts agains Linus' tree - I dropped several > patches that had been merged upstream. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/next/ ).
Might be time to store next patch in .../v3.x/next/ or a new own http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ upload-dir?
- Sedat -
| |