lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
    On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:18:21PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
    > > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one
    > > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original
    > > patchset is consistently performing much better :)
    >
    > It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to
    > assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks!

    Thank you! Glad that we finally reaches some consensus :)

    Thanks,
    Fengguang


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-26 15:27    [W:0.018 / U:29.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site