lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:18:21PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one
> > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original
> > patchset is consistently performing much better :)
>
> It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to
> assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks!

Thank you! Glad that we finally reaches some consensus :)

Thanks,
Fengguang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-26 15:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans