[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6] cgroup: improve old cgroup handling in cgroup_attach_proc()
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
> cgroup_attach_proc() behaves differently from cgroup_attach_task() in
> the following aspects.
> * All hooks are invoked even if no task is actually being moved.
> * ->can_attach_task() is called for all tasks in the group whether the
>  new cgrp is different from the current cgrp or not; however,
>  ->attach_task() is skipped if new equals new.  This makes the calls
>  asymmetric.
> This patch improves old cgroup handling in cgroup_attach_proc() by
> looking up the current cgroup at the head, recording it in the flex
> array along with the task itself, and using it to remove the above two
> differences.  This will also ease further changes.

While I'm all in favour of making things more consistent, do we need
such a big change?

In particular, making the group flex-array entries contain both a task
and a cgroup appears to be only necessary in order to skip tasks where
new_cgroup == old_cgroup. Can't we get the same effect by simply
leaving all such tasks out of the flex-array in the first place?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-25 10:55    [W:0.262 / U:3.380 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site