Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:53:06 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 17/43] microblaze: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() |
| |
On 08/24, Matt Fleming wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:49 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > v2 of this patch depends on "[PATCH 01/43] signal: Add block_sigmask() > > > for adding sigmask to current->blocked" so they need to go through the > > > same tree but this patch would benefit from some maintainer ACK's. > > > > Please add there my ACK to it too.
Thanks Michal.
> > I will add patches 14-16/43 v2 to microblaze next branch keep them > > for a while. I will propose them to Linus tree for v3.2. > > Actually, I just realised this is where it gets a little complicated. If > you take those 3 patches and they're not in Oleg's tree, [PATCH 17/43] > doesn't apply cleanly. Fixing 17/43 up so it applies without patches > 14-16 would result in something like this in handle_signal(), > > if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) { > block_sigmask(ka, sig); > } > return 1; > > Which Linus would have to fixup to its original form when he merges the > two trees. I think all the microblaze patches should go through Oleg's > tree,
Agreed, this looks simpler.
Michal, unless you object, I am going to add the microblaze changes (with your acks) to ptrace branch, it already has 01/43 which adds block_sigmask().
OK?
Oleg.
| |