[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:17 +0200,
> Questions:
> ==========
> I wasn't sure what magic ioctl number to use, so I settled to use the same one
> as a part of UBI: 'O', which was so far only used by UBI but on a higher range
> and leaving some room for UBI to add ioctls (for nw, it uses 'O'/0x00-0x06 and
> ubiblk uses 'O'/0x10-0x11). Is it ok or should ubiblk use a different
> number/range ?

I think this is OK to share them between UBI and ubiblk, as long as this
is documented. But I always CC Arnd when it comes to ioctl-related

P.S. Arnd, you can always find the initial post in lkml, if needed.

Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-22 09:43    [W:0.375 / U:2.544 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site