[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked()
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> This does look like a decent clean up, especially because so many
> architectures got this sequence wrong in the past. But yeah, it will
> require me to rewrite half my series ;-)
> Is it worth rewriting the series? Dunno. I'm not convinced that the
> wrapper buys us enough for that, plus it'd increase the number of
> patches.
> Maybe it'd be better to do it as a separate set of patches?

OK so, I went ahead and rewrote the series using your clean up. It's in
the 'oleg/set-current-blocked-v2' branch at,


Would you mind taking a quick look and see which series you prefer? I'll
wait for your reply before I resend any patches.

Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-08-18 13:11    [W:0.057 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site