[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked()
    On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
    > This does look like a decent clean up, especially because so many
    > architectures got this sequence wrong in the past. But yeah, it will
    > require me to rewrite half my series ;-)
    > Is it worth rewriting the series? Dunno. I'm not convinced that the
    > wrapper buys us enough for that, plus it'd increase the number of
    > patches.
    > Maybe it'd be better to do it as a separate set of patches?

    OK so, I went ahead and rewrote the series using your clean up. It's in
    the 'oleg/set-current-blocked-v2' branch at,


    Would you mind taking a quick look and see which series you prefer? I'll
    wait for your reply before I resend any patches.

    Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-18 13:11    [W:0.031 / U:13.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site