Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:18:53 -0400 | From | Vivek Goyal <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5] blk-cgroup:be able to remove the record of unplugged device |
| |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:57:45PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 10:11 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 08:11:48AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > > > The bug is we're not able to remove the device from blkio cgroup's > > > per-device control files if it gets unplugged. > > > > > > To reproduce the bug: > > > > > > # mount -t cgroup -o blkio xxx /cgroup > > > # cd /cgroup > > > # echo "8:0 1000" > blkio.throttle.read_bps_device > > > # unplug the device > > > # cat blkio.throttle.read_bps_device > > > 8:0 1000 > > > # echo "8:0 0" > blkio.throttle.read_bps_device > > > -bash: echo: write error: No such device > > > > > > After patching, the device removal will succeed. > > > > > > Thanks for the comments of Paul, Zefan, and Vivek. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > Thanks. This looks good to me. > > > > Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> > > > > Vivek > > > > > --- > > > block/blk-cgroup.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c > > > index bcaf16e..b596e54 100644 > > > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c > > > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c > > > @@ -785,10 +785,10 @@ static int blkio_policy_parse_and_set(char *buf, > > > { > > > char *s[4], *p, *major_s = NULL, *minor_s = NULL; > > > int ret; > > > - unsigned long major, minor, temp; > > > + unsigned long major, minor; > > > int i = 0; > > > dev_t dev; > > > - u64 bps, iops; > > > + u64 temp; > > > > > > memset(s, 0, sizeof(s)); > > > > > > @@ -826,20 +826,23 @@ static int blkio_policy_parse_and_set(char *buf, > > > > > > dev = MKDEV(major, minor); > > > > > > - ret = blkio_check_dev_num(dev); > > > + ret = strict_strtoull(s[1], 10, &temp); > > > if (ret) > > > - return ret; > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > - newpn->dev = dev; > > > + /* For rule removal, do not check for device presence. */ > > > + if (temp) { > > > + ret = blkio_check_dev_num(dev); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > > > > - if (s[1] == NULL) > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > + newpn->dev = dev; > > > > > > switch (plid) { > > > case BLKIO_POLICY_PROP: > > > - ret = strict_strtoul(s[1], 10, &temp); > > > - if (ret || (temp < BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN && temp > 0) || > > > - temp > BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX) > > > + if ((temp < BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN && temp > 0) || > > > + temp > BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > newpn->plid = plid; > > > @@ -850,26 +853,18 @@ static int blkio_policy_parse_and_set(char *buf, > > > switch(fileid) { > > > case BLKIO_THROTL_read_bps_device: > > > case BLKIO_THROTL_write_bps_device: > > > - ret = strict_strtoull(s[1], 10, &bps); > > > - if (ret) > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > - > > > newpn->plid = plid; > > > newpn->fileid = fileid; > > > - newpn->val.bps = bps; > > > + newpn->val.bps = temp; > > > break; > > > case BLKIO_THROTL_read_iops_device: > > > case BLKIO_THROTL_write_iops_device: > > > - ret = strict_strtoull(s[1], 10, &iops); > > > - if (ret) > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > - > > > - if (iops > THROTL_IOPS_MAX) > > > + if (temp > THROTL_IOPS_MAX) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > newpn->plid = plid; > > > newpn->fileid = fileid; > > > - newpn->val.iops = (unsigned int)iops; > > > + newpn->val.iops = (unsigned int)temp; > > > break; > > > } > > > break; > > > -- > > > 1.7.6 > > How about this? For a long time.
I have already acked this patch. Jens, what do you think about it.
Thanks Vivek
| |