Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:51:33 +0200 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: Switch NUMA_BUILD and COMPACTION_BUILD to new IS_ENABLED() syntax |
| |
On Wed 10-08-11 17:12:40, Michal Marek wrote: > Introduced in 3.1-rc1, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) expands to a true value > iff CONFIG_NUMA is set. This makes it easier to grep for code that > depends on CONFIG_NUMA.
Same applies to CONFIG_COMPACTION.
> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
I like this.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> --- > include/linux/gfp.h | 2 +- > include/linux/kernel.h | 14 -------------- > mm/page_alloc.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ++-- > mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > [...] > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 6e8ecb6..e052d79 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c [...] > @@ -2097,7 +2098,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, > * allowed per node queues are empty and that nodes are > * over allocated. > */ > - if (NUMA_BUILD && (gfp_mask & GFP_THISNODE) == GFP_THISNODE) > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && (gfp_mask & GFP_THISNODE) == GFP_THISNODE)
I gues it makes sense to follow checkpatch here.
> goto nopage; > > restart:
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic
| |