lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch 00/17] CFS Bandwidth Control v7.1
From
Date
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:39 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
>
> > Going beyond that
> > would be using static_branch() to track if there is any bandwidth
> > tracking required at all.
> >
>
> I spent some time examining this option as well. Our toolchain
> apparently is stuck on gcc-4.4 which left me scratching my head at the
> supposed jump label assembly being omitted until I realized
> CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO was missing. I will roll this up also and benchmark
> tomorrow.

Ah, does it actually make things worse if it uses the static_branch
fallbacks? If so we should probably use some HAVE_JUMP_LABEL foo.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-08 12:35    [W:0.358 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site