Messages in this thread | | | From | Kevin Hilman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Call idle notifiers | Date | Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:08:55 -0700 |
| |
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com> writes:
> Change-Id: Id833e61c13baa1783705ac9e9046d1f0cc90c95e > Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
I don't think the notifiers should be called in ARM-generic code. As discussed w/Colin in his proposal for the CPU PM notifiers, the platform-specific code should decide when to run notifier chain.
To give an example, on OMAP we wouldn't want the notifier chain to be run until the OMAP PM core has programmed the next states of the various power domains. That way the notifier functions could check the next state to determine if their powerdomain is going to retention or off and decide whether or not a context save/restore will be needed.
Kevin
> --- > arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c > index 5e1e541..1b9101e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c > @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ void cpu_idle(void) > while (1) { > tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(1); > leds_event(led_idle_start); > + idle_notifier_call_chain(IDLE_START); > while (!need_resched()) { > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU > if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) > @@ -208,6 +209,7 @@ void cpu_idle(void) > } > } > leds_event(led_idle_end); > + idle_notifier_call_chain(IDLE_END); > tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(); > preempt_enable_no_resched(); > schedule();
| |