Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:05:50 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -tip, final] perf, x86: Add hw_watchdog_set_attr() in a sake of nmi-watchdog on P4 |
| |
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:59:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: ... > > are 'non-sleeping ticks' non-halted cycles - i.e. cycles that always > count with CPU frequency and can thus be used for periodic > frequencies? >
Yes, I think so (btw, as far as I remember oprofile does the same 'threshold' gaming for nmi-watchdog).
Cyrill
| |