Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:19:24 +0200 | From | Kurt Van Dijck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] PWM: add pwm framework support |
| |
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:53:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 04 July 2011, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > > With socketCAN, we encountered a similar problem. Every chip maker > > tries to create added value by means of special options. You can't > > support them all in the framework. Therefore, sysfs can be added > > to configure special things. > > I would expect that pwm is much simpler than CAN, ack > so the amount > of creativity there is also limited. That is true for a single PWM channel. With multiple PWM channels, hardware design tends to be creative in coupling several channels together somehow in order to create some diesel engine control signal ... > > Arnd
Anyway, I explained my concern. It's just _an_ opinion. Kurt
| |