[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] PWM: add pwm framework support
    On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:53:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > On Monday 04 July 2011, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
    > > With socketCAN, we encountered a similar problem. Every chip maker
    > > tries to create added value by means of special options. You can't
    > > support them all in the framework. Therefore, sysfs can be added
    > > to configure special things.
    > I would expect that pwm is much simpler than CAN,
    > so the amount
    > of creativity there is also limited.
    That is true for a single PWM channel.
    With multiple PWM channels, hardware design tends to be creative in coupling
    several channels together somehow in order to create some diesel engine
    control signal ...
    > Arnd

    Anyway, I explained my concern. It's just _an_ opinion.

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-07-04 16:21    [W:0.018 / U:10.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site