Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:36:58 +0200 | | From | Michal Marek <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG_MODULE() |
| |
On 27.7.2011 06:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:42:04 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe<lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote: >>>> I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then. >>>> >>> we need to be careful about namespace pollution/collision. >>> >> For the sake of having numbers: >> >> % git grep -w ENABLED . | wc -l >> 116 >> % git grep -w CONFIGURED . | wc -l >> 11 >> % git grep -w KCONFIG . | wc -l >> 1 > > OK. Then I would go back to a predicate like the original patch had, > e.g.: > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)
Good idea. Is anyone against IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) IS_ENABLED_BUILTIN(CONFIG_FOO) IS_ENABLED_MODULE(CONFIG_FOO) ?
Michal
|  |