lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] man ptrace: add extended description of various ptrace quirks
On 07/21, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> Deleted several outright false statements:
> - pid 1 can be traced
> - tracer is not shown as parent in ps output
> - PTRACE_ATTACH is not "the same behavior as if tracee had done
> a PTRACE_TRACEME": PTRACE_ATTACH delivers a SIGSTOP.
> - SIGSTOP _can_ be injected.

Yes, this is correct, thanks.

> +Tracer can not assume that tracee ALWAYS ends its life by reporting
> +WIFEXITED(status) or WIFSIGNALED(status).
> +.LP
> +.\" or can it? Do we include such a promise into ptrace API?

IIRC, we already discussed this... The traced group leader can
disappear during mt-exec, otherwise the tracee can never go away
silently.

> +Tracer can kill a tracee with ptrace(PTRACE_KILL, pid, 0, 0). This
> +operation is deprecated, use kill(SIGKILL) or tgkill(SIGKILL) instead.
> +The problem with this operation is that it requires tracee to be in
> +signal-delivery-stop, otherwise it may not work (may complete
> +successfully but won't kill the tracee),

In short, ptrace(PTRACE_KILL) is more or less ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, SIGKILL),
but it always returns 0. IOW, it never worked as decribed in the man
page. And I guess today nobody can explain why PTRACE_KILL exists.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-21 19:21    [W:0.184 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site