Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:40:09 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow disabling of sys_iopl, sys_ioperm |
| |
On 07/14/2011 01:38 PM, Mike Waychison wrote: >> >> Wouldn't it be more useful for this to be a sysctl? In particular, like >> many similar things it probably should be a lockable sysctl (three >> states: enabled, disabled, and locked-disabled). >> >> Making it a compile-time option I'm very skeptical to. > > Are there existing examples of this already in the tree? >
I think so, but I don't know off the top of my head.
-hpa
| |