lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow disabling of sys_iopl, sys_ioperm
On 07/14/2011 01:38 PM, Mike Waychison wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it be more useful for this to be a sysctl? In particular, like
>> many similar things it probably should be a lockable sysctl (three
>> states: enabled, disabled, and locked-disabled).
>>
>> Making it a compile-time option I'm very skeptical to.
>
> Are there existing examples of this already in the tree?
>

I think so, but I don't know off the top of my head.

-hpa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-14 22:43    [W:0.049 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site