[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Avoid Wunused-but-set warning
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:53:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> But do as you like. Which parts of SubmittingPatches do you think
> support your interpretation?

> and should we have this line:
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:.
> changed to:
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by: or Reviewed-by:.
> e.g.?

Current practice seems to be that Acked-by is used instead of
Reviewed-by - the latter is comparatively rare.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-11 07:13    [W:0.236 / U:1.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site