Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:24:48 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] VFS: Fix automount for negative autofs dentries |
| |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:13:41PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > > > would do the same. > > But is much less obvious. The LOOKUP_FOLLOW flag is the primary reason for > this statement. The rest are subordinate and would be wholly irrelevant if > LOOKUP_FOLLOW was to be removed from the list.
Then keep the LOOKUP_FOLLOW semi-separate as in the original code. But there's absolutely no reason for the goto spaghetti.
| |