Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:50:19 +1000 | From | Ryan Mallon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH trival/tree-wide] Change Ryan Mallon's email address across the kernel |
| |
On 10/06/11 10:28, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Thursday, June 09, 2011 4:13 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote: >> I no longer work at Bluewater Systems. Update my email address accordingly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon<rmallon@gmail.com> >> Cc: Andre Renaud<andre@bluewatersys.com> >> Cc: H Hartley Sweeten<hsweeten@visionengravers.com> >> Cc: Russell King<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> >> Cc: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> >> Cc: Andrew Victor<avictor.za@gmail.com> >> Cc: David Woodhouse<dwmw2@infradead.org> >> Cc: Anton Vorontsov<cbou@mail.ru> >> Cc: Paul Mundt<lethal@linux-sh.org> >> Cc: Liam Girdwood<lrg@ti.com> >> Cc: Mark Brown<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> >> Cc: trivial@kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> --- > Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten<hsweeten@visionengravers.com> > > Ryan, > > There will probable be some merge conflicts with this.
They should be trivial to fix (or automatic). I would also like this to get merged into 3.0 if still possible. Otherwise I'm going to get three more months of people emailing me at the wrong address :-).
~Ryan
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-snapper9260.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/dma-m2p.c | 2 +- > This file is gone after Mika's DMA patches which are already in linux-next. > >> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c | 2 +- > This file has been moved and renamed. There are also a number of patches > already applied to it in linux-next. > >> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/simone.c | 4 ++-- >> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/mtd/devices/sst25l.c | 4 ++-- > There are a couple patches to this file in linux-next. > >> drivers/power/ds2782_battery.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/video/ep93xx-fb.c | 2 +- >> sound/soc/ep93xx/ep93xx-i2s.c | 4 ++-- >> sound/soc/ep93xx/ep93xx-pcm.c | 4 ++-- >> sound/soc/ep93xx/snappercl15.c | 4 ++-- > The others should be ok. Maybe you should rebase this patch against > linux-next? > > Regards, > Hartley
| |