lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Union mount and overlayfs bake off?
    Date
    David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:

    > I've been dealing with some of Al's issues with the unionmount
    > patches, but I know he's got more - I just can't remember them all.

    A couple of questions I have:

    1) What happens to the union in a cloned namespace (CLONE_NEWNS)?

    2) What's the overhead for non-unioned filesystems if CONFIG_UNION_MOUNTS
    is enabled? Does it show up in any microbenchmarks?

    3) Is there a future strategy for making atomic operations really atomic?
    E.g. what happens if power is lost in the middle of a copy-up? Or if
    whiteout of source fails after a successful rename()?

    4) Have you looked at overlayfs? Do you have any thoughts about the
    relative merrits of each solution?

    Thanks,
    Miklos


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-30 14:47    [W:0.019 / U:125.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site