Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:07:28 +0800 | From | Brad Campbell <> | Subject | Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39 |
| |
On 03/06/11 23:50, Bernhard Held wrote: > Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell: >> On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote: >>>> Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere >>>> in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge). >>>> >>>> All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses. >>> >>> Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from >>> going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two >>> of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the >>> same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related. >> >> Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter & >> cc'd to kvm, >> but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to >> netdev has >> not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped >> into the >> bit bucket also. > Just another reference 3.5 months ago: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html
<waves hands around shouting "I have a reproducible test case for this and don't mind patching and crashing the machine to get it fixed">
Attempted to add netfilter-devel to the cc this time.
| |