lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/29] gma500: Ensure the frame buffer has a linear virtual mapping
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
>
> We need this for the framebuffer in order to ensure that the kernel
> framebuffer layer can handle it when using KMS. Except for the base
> framebuffer this isn't a concern.
>
> Add an npage field to the gtt as too many copies of the page calculation
> are getting spread around the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h | 1 +
> drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c | 18 ++++++---------
> drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h | 5 ++--
> 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

This doesn't apply:

patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 120.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 149.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 193.
4 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c.rej
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h

Any ideas?

Is there drm changes in linux-next for this driver that I don't have?

If so, maybe we need to just start sending these patches through that tree?

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-28 23:29    [W:0.204 / U:0.976 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site