Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:18:59 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/29] gma500: Ensure the frame buffer has a linear virtual mapping |
| |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> > > We need this for the framebuffer in order to ensure that the kernel > framebuffer layer can handle it when using KMS. Except for the base > framebuffer this isn't a concern. > > Add an npage field to the gtt as too many copies of the page calculation > are getting spread around the code. > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> > --- > > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h | 1 + > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c | 18 ++++++--------- > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h | 5 ++-- > 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
This doesn't apply:
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 79. Hunk #3 FAILED at 120. Hunk #5 FAILED at 149. Hunk #7 FAILED at 193. 4 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c.rej patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h
Any ideas?
Is there drm changes in linux-next for this driver that I don't have?
If so, maybe we need to just start sending these patches through that tree?
greg k-h
| |