lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dmaengine: failure to get a specific DMA channel is not critical
From
Date
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 10:49 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
> <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Guennadi, all
> >
> >> There exist systems with multiple DMA controllers with different
> >> capabilities. For example, on some sh-mobile / rmobile systems there are
> >> DMA controllers, whose channels can be configured to be used with
> >> SD- and MMC-host controllers, serial ports etc. Besides there are also
> >> DMA controllers, that can only be used for one special function, e.g.,
> >> for USB. In such cases the DMA client filter function can just choose
> >> to specify to the DMA driver, which channel it needs. Then the
> >> .device_alloc_chan_resources() method of the DMA driver will check,
> >> whether it can provide that dunction. If not, it will fail and the loop
> >> in __dma_request_channel() will continue to the next DMA device, until
> >> it finds a suitable one. This works fine with just one minor glitch:
> >> the kernel logs error messages like
> >>
> >> dmaengine: failed to get <channel name>: (-<error code>)
> >>
> >> after each such non-critical failure. This patch lowers priority of
> >> this message to the debug level.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Morimoto-san, I don't expect this patch to fail;), but if you like, you
> >> could give it a short spin and send your "tested-by" in reply to this
> >> mail.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > I tested this patch.
> >
> > I don't know that the dmaengine design,
> > but this patch remove non-critical error message from USB-DMAC for me.
> > I tested it on mackerel board + renesas_usbhs + USB-DMAC
> >
> > Tested-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>
> So I too gave the USBHS + USBHS-DMAC patches a go on top of
> linux-3.0-rc and they seem to work as expected.
> Without "[PATCH] dmaengine: failure to get a specific DMA channel is
> not critical" applied I get the following log:
>
> / # echo /dev/mtdblock4 > /sys/devices/platform/renesas_usbhs.1/gadget/lun0/file
>
> [hook up laptop to the USB gadget port]
>
> / # dmaengine: failed to get dma0chan4: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma1chan0: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma2chan0: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma3chan0: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma0chan4: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma1chan0: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma2chan0: (-22)
> dmaengine: failed to get dma3chan0: (-22)
> g_mass_storage gadget: high speed config #1: Linux File-Backed Storage
>
> With this patch applied the "dmaengine: failed to get..." messages all go away.
>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Applied Thanks.



--
~Vinod



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-24 13:25    [W:0.046 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site