lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [BUG?] numa required on x86_64?
From
Date
On fre, 2011-06-24 at 15:23 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:00:58 +0200 Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just found this when wanting to play with development kernels again.
> > Since there is no -gitXX snapshots anymore, I cloned the git =)...
> >
> > But, it failed to build properly with my config:
> >
> > mm/page_cgroup.c line 308: node_start_pfn and node_end_pfn is only
> > defined under NUMA on x86_64.
> >
> > The commit that changed the use of this was introduced recently while
> > the mmzone_64.h hasn't been changed since april.
>
> You should have cc-ed the commit Author (I did so).

Sorry, tired and i was upgrading systems at work when i found this =)

> > commit 37573e8c718277103f61f03741bdc5606d31b07e
> > Author: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Date: Wed Jun 15 15:08:42 2011 -0700
> >
> > memcg: fix init_page_cgroup nid with sparsemem
> >
> > Commit 21a3c9646873 ("memcg: allocate memory cgroup structures in local
> > nodes") makes page_cgroup allocation as NUMA aware. But that caused a
> > problem https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36192.
> >
> > The problem was getting a NID from invalid struct pages, which was not
> > initialized because it was out-of-node, out of [node_start_pfn,
> > node_end_pfn)
> >
> > Now, with sparsemem, page_cgroup_init scans pfn from 0 to max_pfn. But
> > this may scan a pfn which is not on any node and can access memmap which
> > is not initialized.
> >
> > This makes page_cgroup_init() for SPARSEMEM node aware and remove a code
> > to get nid from page->flags. (Then, we'll use valid NID always.)
> >
> > [akpm@linux-foundation.org: try to fix up comments]
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>
> A patch for this has been posted at least 2 times.
> It's here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130827204306775&w=2
>
> Andrew, please merge this (^that^) patch.

Damn, i haven't been following LKML that closely recently =/

> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

--
Ian Kumlien -- http://demius.net || http://pomac.netswarm.net
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-25 02:09    [W:0.039 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site