Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:39:39 +0300 | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add ARM cpu topology definition | | From | Amit Kucheria <> |
| |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 June 2011 12:14, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote: >>> + >>> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].socket_id) >>> +#define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id) >>> +#define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (&(cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)) >>> +#define topology_thread_cpumask(cpu) (&(cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling)) >> >> These #defines are not used anywhere. > > They are used in topology.c driver and sched.c > >> >>> +#define mc_capable() (cpu_topology[0].socket_id != -1) >>> +#define smt_capable() (cpu_topology[0].thread_id != -1) >> >> Neither are these. > > They are used in sched.c >
Ahh, sorry for the noise. Documentation/cputopology.txt is most illuminating. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |