lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [GIT PULL linux-firmware.git] OLPC libertas firmware blobs
    On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:47:13 -0500
    Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:

    > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 10:41 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
    > > On 19 June 2011 05:42, Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> wrote:
    > > >> LICENCE.OLPC | 33
    > > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WHENCE
    > > >> | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ libertas/lbtf_sdio.bin | Bin
    > > >> 0 -> 120924 bytes libertas/lbtf_usb.bin | Bin 0 ->
    > > >> 118888 bytes libertas/sd8686_v9_OLPC.bin | Bin 0 -> 124244
    > > >> bytes libertas/usb8388_v5_OLPC.bin | Bin 0 -> 127824 bytes
    > > >
    > > > Of course, if people would prefer the OLPC version to supersede
    > > > the ones currently in the linux-firmware tree, I can do that
    > > > instead. I don't know what versions of sd8686.bin and
    > > > usb8388.bin are actually in the tree. I also don't know if the
    > > > OLPC versions improve or make things worse for people using those
    > > > chips on non-OLPC systems.
    > >
    > > This overlaps with a submission I made the other day (of usb8388
    > > firmware), sorry for the lack of coordination there.
    > >
    > > I don't think the OLPC hardware has any quirks or special features
    > > that mean it requires special firmware.
    > >
    > > However, for the usb8388 we do use a special firmware developed by
    > > Cozybit (not Marvell), the one you submitted, which has its own
    > > versioning scheme. The main difference is that it includes mesh
    > > support. I am pretty sure it would run on any usb8388 but OLPC is
    > > the only user of the hardware anyway. See
    > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libertas-dev/2010-November/003330.html
    > > and the rest of the discussion.
    > >
    > > As for sd8686, I thought our firmware was standard, from Marvell,
    > > and simply a newer version of what is in linux-firmware. Do you have
    > > reason to believe otherwise?
    >
    > For usb8388 I don't think we really care which firmware is default
    > since OLPC was about the only consumer of that chip that I've ever
    > heard of.
    >
    > For the other firmware I periodically trawled Marvell's Extranet and
    > grabbed latest firmware from there. If you guys have a newer micro
    > version of the firmware then great, push it. Latest I have access to
    > for 8686 is SD-8686-FEDORA26FC6-SYSKT-9.70.20.p0-26409.p64 so if
    > you've got something newer great.


    Looks like the one on dev.l.o is older (9.70.7.p0). Shall I redo the
    pull request a) ignoring sd8686, b) replacing usb8388 v5 with the OLPC
    version, and c) including both thinfirm blobs as well, then?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-21 09:21    [W:0.021 / U:0.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site