lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/15] xen/trace: add segment desc tracing
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:15:04PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 16 +++++++++-
> include/trace/events/xen.h | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index dd7b88f..fa4e2d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static void xen_set_ldt(const void *addr, unsigned entries)
> struct mmuext_op *op;
> struct multicall_space mcs = xen_mc_entry(sizeof(*op));
>
> + trace_xen_cpu_set_ldt(addr, entries);
> +
> op = mcs.args;
> op->cmd = MMUEXT_SET_LDT;
> op->arg1.linear_addr = (unsigned long)addr;
> @@ -496,6 +498,8 @@ static void xen_write_ldt_entry(struct desc_struct *dt, int entrynum,
> xmaddr_t mach_lp = arbitrary_virt_to_machine(&dt[entrynum]);
> u64 entry = *(u64 *)ptr;
>
> + trace_xen_cpu_write_ldt_entry(dt, entrynum, entry);
> +
> preempt_disable();
>
> xen_mc_flush();
> @@ -565,6 +569,8 @@ static void xen_write_idt_entry(gate_desc *dt, int entrynum, const gate_desc *g)
> unsigned long p = (unsigned long)&dt[entrynum];
> unsigned long start, end;
>
> + trace_xen_cpu_write_idt_entry(dt, entrynum, g);
> +
> preempt_disable();
>
> start = __this_cpu_read(idt_desc.address);
> @@ -619,6 +625,8 @@ static void xen_load_idt(const struct desc_ptr *desc)
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
> static struct trap_info traps[257];
>
> + trace_xen_cpu_load_idt(desc);
> +
> spin_lock(&lock);
>
> __get_cpu_var(idt_desc) = *desc;
> @@ -637,6 +645,8 @@ static void xen_load_idt(const struct desc_ptr *desc)
> static void xen_write_gdt_entry(struct desc_struct *dt, int entry,
> const void *desc, int type)
> {
> + trace_xen_cpu_write_gdt_entry(dt, entry, desc, type);
> +
> preempt_disable();
>
> switch (type) {
> @@ -665,6 +675,8 @@ static void xen_write_gdt_entry(struct desc_struct *dt, int entry,
> static void __init xen_write_gdt_entry_boot(struct desc_struct *dt, int entry,
> const void *desc, int type)
> {
> + trace_xen_cpu_write_gdt_entry(dt, entry, desc, type);
> +
> switch (type) {
> case DESC_LDT:
> case DESC_TSS:
> @@ -684,7 +696,9 @@ static void __init xen_write_gdt_entry_boot(struct desc_struct *dt, int entry,
> static void xen_load_sp0(struct tss_struct *tss,
> struct thread_struct *thread)
> {
> - struct multicall_space mcs = xen_mc_entry(0);
> + struct multicall_space mcs;
> +
> + mcs = xen_mc_entry(0);

<scratches his head> Is this prepping it for another commit?

> MULTI_stack_switch(mcs.mc, __KERNEL_DS, thread->sp0);
> xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
> }
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/xen.h b/include/trace/events/xen.h
> index 5811c24..b1f73c4 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/xen.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/xen.h
> @@ -405,6 +405,81 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xen_mmu_pgd_unpin,
> TP_printk("mm %p pgd %p", __entry->mm, __entry->pgd)
> );
>
> +/* CPU */
> +TRACE_EVENT(xen_cpu_write_ldt_entry,
> + TP_PROTO(struct desc_struct *dt, int entrynum, u64 desc),
> + TP_ARGS(dt, entrynum, desc),
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(struct desc_struct *, dt)
> + __field(int, entrynum)
> + __field(u64, desc)
> + ),
> + TP_fast_assign(__entry->dt = dt;
> + __entry->entrynum = entrynum;
> + __entry->desc = desc;
> + ),
> + TP_printk("dt %p entrynum %d entry %016llx",
> + __entry->dt, __entry->entrynum,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->desc)
> + );
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(xen_cpu_write_idt_entry,
> + TP_PROTO(gate_desc *dt, int entrynum, const gate_desc *ent),
> + TP_ARGS(dt, entrynum, ent),
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(gate_desc *, dt)
> + __field(int, entrynum)
> + ),
> + TP_fast_assign(__entry->dt = dt;
> + __entry->entrynum = entrynum;
> + ),
> + TP_printk("dt %p entrynum %d",
> + __entry->dt, __entry->entrynum)
> + );

The 'ent' isn't being printed?

> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(xen_cpu_load_idt,
> + TP_PROTO(const struct desc_ptr *desc),
> + TP_ARGS(desc),
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(unsigned long, addr)
> + ),
> + TP_fast_assign(__entry->addr = desc->address),
> + TP_printk("addr %lx", __entry->addr)
> + );
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(xen_cpu_write_gdt_entry,
> + TP_PROTO(struct desc_struct *dt, int entrynum, const void *desc, int type),
> + TP_ARGS(dt, entrynum, desc, type),
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(struct desc_struct *, dt)
> + __field(int, entrynum)
> + __field(int, type)
> + __field(u64, desc)

The order here is different from the arguments.
> + ),
> + TP_fast_assign(__entry->dt = dt;
> + __entry->entrynum = entrynum;
> + __entry->type = type;
> + __entry->desc = *(u64 *)desc;
> + ),

Ditto
> + TP_printk("dt %p entrynum %d type %d desc %016llx",
> + __entry->dt, __entry->entrynum, __entry->type,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->desc)
> + );
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(xen_cpu_set_ldt,
> + TP_PROTO(const void *addr, unsigned entries),
> + TP_ARGS(addr, entries),
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(const void *, addr)
> + __field(unsigned, entries)
> + ),
> + TP_fast_assign(__entry->addr = addr;
> + __entry->entries = entries),
> + TP_printk("addr %p entries %u",
> + __entry->addr, __entry->entries)
> + );
> +
> +
> #endif /* _TRACE_XEN_H */
>
> /* This part must be outside protection */
> --
> 1.7.5.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-21 16:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans