lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/12] vfs: increase shrinker batch size
Just noticed below two typos.

* Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Now that the per-sb shrinker is responsible for shrinking 2 or more
> caches, increase the batch size to keep econmies of scale for

economies

(..)

> Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt | 5 +++++
> fs/super.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
> index dc732d2..2e26973 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
> @@ -317,6 +317,11 @@ or bottom half).
> the VM is trying to reclaim under GFP_NOFS conditions, hence this
> method does not need to handle that situation itself.
>
> + Implementations must include conditional reschedule calls inside any
> + scanning loop that is done. This allows the VFS to determine
> + appropriate scan batch sizes without having to worry about whether
> + implementations will cause holdoff problems due ot large batch sizes.

due to

Best regards,
Nicolas Kaiser


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-02 11:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans