lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/12] vfs: increase shrinker batch size
    Just noticed below two typos.

    * Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>:
    > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    >
    > Now that the per-sb shrinker is responsible for shrinking 2 or more
    > caches, increase the batch size to keep econmies of scale for

    economies

    (..)

    > Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt | 5 +++++
    > fs/super.c | 1 +
    > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
    > index dc732d2..2e26973 100644
    > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
    > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
    > @@ -317,6 +317,11 @@ or bottom half).
    > the VM is trying to reclaim under GFP_NOFS conditions, hence this
    > method does not need to handle that situation itself.
    >
    > + Implementations must include conditional reschedule calls inside any
    > + scanning loop that is done. This allows the VFS to determine
    > + appropriate scan batch sizes without having to worry about whether
    > + implementations will cause holdoff problems due ot large batch sizes.

    due to

    Best regards,
    Nicolas Kaiser


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-02 11:33    [W:0.022 / U:0.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site