Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:30:26 +0200 | | From | Nicolas Kaiser <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/12] vfs: increase shrinker batch size |
| |
Just noticed below two typos.
* Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > > Now that the per-sb shrinker is responsible for shrinking 2 or more > caches, increase the batch size to keep econmies of scale for
economies
(..)
> Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt | 5 +++++ > fs/super.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt > index dc732d2..2e26973 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt > @@ -317,6 +317,11 @@ or bottom half). > the VM is trying to reclaim under GFP_NOFS conditions, hence this > method does not need to handle that situation itself. > > + Implementations must include conditional reschedule calls inside any > + scanning loop that is done. This allows the VFS to determine > + appropriate scan batch sizes without having to worry about whether > + implementations will cause holdoff problems due ot large batch sizes.
due to
Best regards, Nicolas Kaiser
|  |