lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/6] MAINTAINERS: Remove unused PERFORMANCE EVENTS pattern

    * Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:

    > No arch/*/lib/perf_event* files exist so remove the pattern.
    >
    > cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
    > cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
    > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    > cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
    > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
    > ---
    > MAINTAINERS | 1 -
    > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
    > index ab6340f..6f6a8ef 100644
    > --- a/MAINTAINERS
    > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
    > @@ -4908,7 +4908,6 @@ F: arch/*/kernel/perf_event*.c
    > F: arch/*/kernel/*/perf_event*.c
    > F: arch/*/kernel/*/*/perf_event*.c
    > F: arch/*/include/asm/perf_event.h
    > -F: arch/*/lib/perf_event*.c
    > F: arch/*/kernel/perf_callchain.c
    > F: tools/perf/

    The arch/*/lib/ hierarchy is a common place to put stuff into, it
    does not hurt at all to have it mentioned.

    In Linux there's 10+ really important, not yet implemented features
    to implement, there's 100+ under-maintained subsystems to maintain,
    there's 1000+ not yet fixed bugs to fix, there's 10,000+ ugly driver
    files to be improved and there's 1,000,000+ stylistic errors to fix.

    Mucking with the MAINTAINERS file on the level you did in this patch
    comes some time after we've fixed the 1,000,000+ stylistic errors.

    Could you please stop mucking with these patterns and start dealing
    with some of the more important problems we have?

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-02 09:43    [W:0.047 / U:93.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site