[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,aligned(4) instead of removing the packed attribute
    On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Alexander Holler wrote:

    > > Hmmm. I won't say that ((packed,aligned(4))) is wrong. But it's not
    > > clearly necessary either.
    > Maybe I should have added a "cosmetic:" in front of the subject of the
    > patch. ;)
    > Using packed doesn't seem to be necessary (at least not with those
    > versions of gcc I'm using here), I've tried both versions (on arm,
    > without packed and with packed, aligned(4)) and both are working. I've
    > only posted the patch because I found the usage of packed, aligned(4)
    > much clearer than without packed. And It might help avoiding such
    > discussions like this with people like me who aren't that deep involved
    > in gcc-specific implementation details. ;)
    > Anyway, feel free to nack that patch. I don't really care and just
    > thought I should post it (e.g. as an alternative to removing that packed).

    There are other structures that need to avoid padding but aren't marked
    ((packed)), such as ehci_qtd and ehci_qh_hw in drivers/usb/host/ehci.h.
    I don't see why those in ehci_def.h should get special treatment.

    Alan Stern

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-16 22:33    [W:0.018 / U:17.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site