[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex
    On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:37 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:12 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
    > > Thanks to Andi for providing the info. We've used this workaround in
    > > our testing so it will not mask true kernel scaling bottlenecks.
    > tip+sirq+linus is still slightly faster than .39 here, although removing
    > that sysconf() wreckage closed the gap considerably (needing to know the
    > number of cpus to optimize locking sounds like a trainwreck all of its
    > own, needing it _that_ often instead of just once at startup is even
    > worse).


    Fengguang's readahead fixes for tmpfs removed another bottleneck before
    anon_vma->lock become dominant.
    We've found this issue when we were testing exim earlier.
    It was merged in 3.0-rc2 but not in plain 2.6.39. So with this patch on
    2.6.39 we should get better comparison with 3.0-rc2.



     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-16 03:11    [W:0.019 / U:31.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site