[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 1/2] wireless: Remove casts of void *
    On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:23 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
    > Joe,

    Hi Julian.

    > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:02, Joe Perches <> wrote:
    > > Unnecessary casts of void * clutter the code.
    > > These are the remainder casts after several specific
    > > patches to remove netdev_priv and dev_priv.
    > You seem to have removed a lot of casts that don't relate to these cleanups.
    > In particular, some of the casts seem to relate more to documentation
    > rather than just changing pointer types to make the compiler happy.

    All of the cast removals are casts of void* types.
    I think none of of the casts are useful.
    None of them are required, all are duplicative.

    > In
    > particular, I'm referring to the casts describing the different usages
    > of data_buf in mwiflex, and around some pointer math in ath9k.

    Can you describe more in detail why you think these are documentary?

    This sort of cast:

    diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c
    @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int mwifiex_ret_11n_cfg(struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp, void *data_buf)
    struct host_cmd_ds_11n_cfg *htcfg = &resp->params.htcfg;

    if (data_buf) {
    - tx_cfg = (struct mwifiex_ds_11n_tx_cfg *) data_buf;
    + tx_cfg = data_buf;

    I think pretty useless. tx_cfg is a struct mwifiex_ds_11n_tx_cfg *.

    > Whilst I'm sure that the compiler is smart enough to handle automatic
    > casts between pointer types, some of these, in particular the mwiflex
    > bits, add some documentation to the code.

    I think not. Opinions of course can vary.
    cheers, Joe

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-14 07:35    [W:0.020 / U:35.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site