lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why is CONFIG_FHANDLE an option??
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:42:50AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Yes, I'm aware of that. Doesn't mean we have to make things worse.
> Just because we've had optional syscalls in the past doesn't mean we have
> to add more, nor that the existing ones were a good idea. IMHO they should
> be removed as options and just included unconditionally - not too late to
> correct this...

There's fanotify in that pile. Consider that bright idea *strongly* NAKed.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-11 01:01    [W:0.053 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site