Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:58:35 +0100 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: Why is CONFIG_FHANDLE an option?? |
| |
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:42:50AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Yes, I'm aware of that. Doesn't mean we have to make things worse. > Just because we've had optional syscalls in the past doesn't mean we have > to add more, nor that the existing ones were a good idea. IMHO they should > be removed as options and just included unconditionally - not too late to > correct this...
There's fanotify in that pile. Consider that bright idea *strongly* NAKed.
| |