Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:39:03 +0900 | | From | Tejun Heo <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification, take#4 |
| |
Hey,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 05/30, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > * PTRACE_LISTEN added. This puts tracee into quasi-active state where > > wait(2) and sync ptrace requests fail and tracee is allowed to > > re-trap into STOP to notify an async event. > > Nice! > > Personally, I think the whole series is fine. So far I only read it > inline (without applying). I'll try to read it carefully patch-by-patch, > it is always good to try to re-check the details, but I do not expect > I'll find something which should delay this series from merging into > ptrace tree.
Yeah, yeah, PTRACE_LISTEN turned out to be pretty easy to implement. I didn't really have to change too much. I'll test different corner cases (different thread doing waking/sleeping, race against INTERRUPT kind of things) and let you know how it goes.
Thanks.
-- tejun
|  |