lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/8] mm: export get_vma_policy()
Date
> diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> index 31ac26c..c2f6032 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *p);
> struct mempolicy *mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp,
> unsigned long idx);
>
> +struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr);
> +
> extern void numa_default_policy(void);
> extern void numa_policy_init(void);
> extern void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new,
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 959a8b8..5bfb03e 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_mbind(compat_ulong_t start, compat_ulong_t len,
> * freeing by another task. It is the caller's responsibility to free the
> * extra reference for shared policies.
> */
> -static struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
> +struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)

Looks reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-09 09:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans