lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/8] mm: remove MPOL_MF_STATS
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Mapping statistics in a NUMA environment is now computed using the
> > generic walk_page_range() logic. Remove the old/equivalent
> > functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca>
> > ---
> > mm/mempolicy.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index dfe27e3..63c0d69 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@
> > /* Internal flags */
> > #define MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK (MPOL_MF_INTERNAL << 0) /* Skip checks for continuous vmas */
> > #define MPOL_MF_INVERT (MPOL_MF_INTERNAL << 1) /* Invert check for nodemask */
> > -#define MPOL_MF_STATS (MPOL_MF_INTERNAL << 2) /* Gather statistics */
> >
> > static struct kmem_cache *policy_cache;
> > static struct kmem_cache *sn_cache;
> > @@ -492,9 +491,7 @@ static int check_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> > if (node_isset(nid, *nodes) == !!(flags & MPOL_MF_INVERT))
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (flags & MPOL_MF_STATS)
> > - gather_stats(page, private, pte_dirty(*pte));
> > - else if (flags & (MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL))
> > + if (flags & (MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL))
> > migrate_page_add(page, private, flags);
> > else
> > break;
>
> This hunk looks good to me.
>
>
> > @@ -2572,6 +2569,7 @@ static int gather_pte_stats(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> > unsigned long pte_size, struct mm_walk *walk)
> > {
> > struct page *page;
> > + int nid;
> >
> > if (pte_none(*pte))
> > return 0;
> > @@ -2580,6 +2578,10 @@ static int gather_pte_stats(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> > if (!page)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + nid = page_to_nid(page);
> > + if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > gather_stats(page, walk->private, pte_dirty(*pte));
> > return 0;
>
> However this hunk should be moved into patch [2/8]. because 1) keeping
> bisectability 2) The description says "Remove the old/equivalent
> functionality." but it added new functionality.

Absolutely. Will move into the proper location and resend the whole
series.

Thanks again,

--
steve



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-09 21:41    [W:0.072 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site