lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.38.4: xfs speed problem?
    On 5/7/2011 7:33 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
    > On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:09:46PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
    >> Hello,
    >>
    >> Using 2.6.38.4 on two hosts:
    >>
    >> Host 1:
    >> $ /usr/bin/time find geocities.data 1> /dev/null
    >> 80.92user 417.93system 2:19:07elapsed 5%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 105520maxresident)k
    >> 0inputs+0outputs (0major+73373minor)pagefaults 0swaps
    >>
    >> # xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/sda1
    >> actual 40203982, ideal 40088075, fragmentation factor 0.29%
    >>
    >> meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=44, agsize=268435455 blks
    >> = sectsz=512 attr=2
    >> data = bsize=4096 blocks=11718704640, imaxpct=5
    >> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
    >> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
    >> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=521728, version=2
    >> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
    >> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
    >>
    >> --
    >>
    >> Host 2:
    >> $ /usr/bin/time find geocities.data 1>/dev/null
    >> 54.60user 337.20system 48:42.71elapsed 13%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 105632maxresident)k
    >> 0inputs+0outputs (1major+72981minor)pagefaults 0swaps
    >>
    >> # xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/sdb1
    >> actual 37998306, ideal 37939331, fragmentation factor 0.16%
    >>
    >> meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=256 agcount=10, agsize=268435455 blks
    >> = sectsz=512 attr=2
    >> data = bsize=4096 blocks=2441379328, imaxpct=5
    >> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
    >> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
    >> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=521728, version=2
    >> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
    >> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0


    How much would it help, if any, with this specific 'test', or with
    overall XFS performance, if Justin were to...

    >> Host 1: RAID-6 (7200 RPM Drives, 18+1 hot spare)

    remake the fs on the above device with 'sw=16' or remount with
    appropriate sunit and swidth values?

    >> Host 2: RAID-6 (7200 RPM Drives, 12)

    remake the fs on the above device with 'sw=10' or remount with
    appropriate sunit and swidth values?

    --
    Stan



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-08 19:21    [W:0.028 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site