lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Move Qualcomm gpio drivers into drivers dir
Date
On Fri, May 27 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> On Fri, 27 May 2011, David Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, May 27 2011, David Brown wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 26 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:50:46PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
>> >>> This patch series moves the Qualcomm MSM gpio device drivers into the
>> >>> drivers/gpio directory.
>> >>>
>> >>> The MSM's have two flavors of gpio driver. The one for the newer
>> >>> v7-based chips is a bit cleaner, and can just be moved. The one for
>> >>> the older v6-based chips took some cleanup to get rid of numerous
>> >>> ifdefs based on the particular machine. Both drivers can now be
>> >>> selected and will be used on appropriate targets.
>> >>>
>> >>> There is still a minor entanglement with the MSM-specific gpiomux
>> >>> code. This will be cleaned up as MSM moves to use pinmux.
>> >>>
>> >>> David Brown (7):
>> >>> msm: gpio: Remove unsupported devices
>> >>> msm: Remove chip-ifdefs for GPIO io mappings
>> >>> msm: gpio: Remove chip-specific register definitions
>> >>> msm: gpio: Remove ifdefs on gpio chip registers
>> >>> msm: gpiomux: Move public API to public header
>> >>> gpio_msm: Move Qualcomm v6 MSM driver into drivers
>> >>> gpio_msm: Move Qualcomm MSM v2 gpio driver into drivers
>> >>
>> >> What's the status of this series. I only got cc'd on the last two
>> >> patches; did you want me to pick up the whole lot, or is it being
>> >> merged via the msm tree?
>> >
>> > Let me send out an update, incorporating the suggestions. I need to
>> > rebase these changes off of the current MSM code, since the msm-next
>> > tree contains changes that aren't going into the merge window because of
>> > extra ARM scrutiny.
>> >
>> >> Alternately, if there is a git branch with these patches in it, then I
>> >> can merge that instead of applying individually.
>> >
>> > I'll send you a pull request after I send out the updates.
>>
>> Oh, and in case it isn't clear, I wasn't expecting these to make it into
>> this merge window.
>
> Why not?

They haven't been tested in linux-next for one, but more importantly, I
have to redo them to not include the msm-core changes that aren't going
to be going in.

I'm probably not going to be able to get to this until next week.

David

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-27 23:21    [W:0.044 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site