Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 May 2011 14:30:06 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/net/caif) |
| |
On Thu, 26 May 2011 23:15:34 +0200 Sjur Brændeland wrote:
> Hi Randy, > > [Randy] > > (not new) > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:194: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void > > drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:202: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void > > > > > > I'm curious: how do warnings like this get overlooked? > > too much noise in the build messages? or it wasn't overlooked, just ignored? > > The patch introducing this problem is "tty: make receive_buf() > return the amout of bytes received" by Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>. > It seems that this patch has been posted to linux-serial and not to > the netdev list or the gits net-next-2.6 or net-2.6 that I follow. > It's probably no excuse, but this problem is news to me.
I see. Thanks for the explanation.
> Should I post a patch on linux-next anyway for this issue?
You or Felipe should, but he recently sent this note to the USB mailing list:
"I'll be away until 31st of May on a business travel. Don't expect me to look into patches during that period."
so it looks like it would better for you to do it, please.
thanks, --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |