Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 May 2011 07:33:44 +0300 | From | Mika Westerberg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support |
| |
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:47:14PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > IMHO it is better to have ep93xx implementation on its own driver since it is > > not a real AMBA PL022 peripheral but some weird hack made by Cirrus (although > > my opinions are bit biased). > > I disagree because it's IMO at first sight no more deviant than our "PL023" > variants that still use the same pl022 driver.
Ok.
Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the last patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx.
We can then try to use amba-pl022 driver with ep93xx and see if it works or not, and how much work is needed. I would like some comments from Hartley and Ryan also.
> Is there some inexepensive hardware with EP93xx I can get to fix this > myself?
Check for example Technologic Systems (embeddedarm.com), I have their TS-7260 board which has ep9302.
| |