lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: SLUB regression in current Linus
From
Date
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 10:04 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > So simply return the object. In the debug case we do not need all the other
> > > processing that unlock_out: does.
> >
> > So that patch looks like it should explain things.
> >
> > But exactly why don't we need the ->tid update and the ALLOC_SLOWPATH
> > stats? Both of them would seem to be equally valid for the debug case.
>
> We always fall back to the slow path in the debug case. So the tid update
> is useless.

tid change is updated anyway at the end of deactivate_slab()


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-25 17:47    [W:0.063 / U:1.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site