lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64
On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left
> over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be
> appropriate to push this through your tree?
>

I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is
cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

-hpa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-25 01:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site