lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64
    On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
    >
    > It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left
    > over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be
    > appropriate to push this through your tree?
    >

    I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is
    cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better.

    Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

    -hpa


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-25 01:35    [W:0.018 / U:29.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site