Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 24 May 2011 16:33:33 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64 |
| |
On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left > over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be > appropriate to push this through your tree? >
I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-hpa
|  |