[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/9] HWPoison: add memory_failure_queue()
    On 05/23/2011 07:01 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >> If my understanding as above is correct, I think this is a general and
    >> complex solution. It is a little hard for user to understand which 'active
    >> filters' are in effect. He may need some runtime assistant to understand the
    >> code (maybe /sys/events/active_filters, which list all filters in effect
    >> now), because that is hard only by reading the source code. Anyway, this is
    >> a design style choice.
    > I don't think it's complex: the built-in rules are in plain sight (can be in
    > the source code or can even be explicitly registered callbacks), the
    > configuration/tooling installed rules will be as complex as the admin or tool
    > wants them to be.
    >> There are still some issues, I don't know how to solve in above framework.
    >> - If there are two processes request the same type of hardware error
    >> events. One hardware error event will be copied to two ring buffers (each
    >> for one process), but the 'active filters' should be run only once for each
    >> hardware error event.
    > With persistent events 'active filters' should only be attached to the central
    > persistent event.

    OK. I see.

    >> - How to deal with ring-buffer overflow? For example, there is full of
    >> corrected memory error in ring-buffer, and now a recoverable memory error
    >> occurs but it can not be put into perf ring buffer because of ring-buffer
    >> overflow, how to deal with the recoverable memory error?
    > The solution is to make it large enough. With *every* queueing solution there
    > will be some sort of queue size limit.

    Another solution could be:

    Create two ring-buffer. One is for logging and will be read by RAS
    daemon; the other is for recovering, the event record will be removed
    from the ring-buffer after all 'active filters' have been run on it.
    Even RAS daemon being restarted or hang, recoverable error can be taken
    cared of.

    Best Regards,
    Huang Ying

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-24 04:13    [W:0.021 / U:129.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site