lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 09/14] virtio_net: fix TX capacity checks using new API
    Date
    On Fri, 20 May 2011 02:11:47 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
    > virtio net uses the number of sg entries to
    > check for TX ring capacity freed. But this
    > gives incorrect results when indirect buffers
    > are used. Use the new capacity API instead.

    OK, but this explanation needs enhancement, such as noting the actual
    results of that miscalculation. Something like:

    virtio_net uses the number of sg entries in the skb it frees to
    calculate how many descriptors in the ring have just been made
    available. But this value is an overestimate: with indirect buffers
    each skb only uses one descriptor entry, meaning we may wake the queue
    only to find we still can't transmit anything.

    Using the new virtqueue_get_capacity() call, we can exactly determine
    the remaining capacity, so we should use that instead.

    But, here's the side effect:
    > /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
    > - capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
    > + free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
    > + capacity = virtqueue_get_capacity(vi->svq);
    > if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {

    That capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS is too much for indirect buffers. This
    means we waste 20 entries in the ring, but OTOH if we hit OOM we fall
    back to direct buffers and we *will* need this.

    Which means this comment in the driver is now wrong:

    /* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
    if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
    if (net_ratelimit()) {
    if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) {
    dev_warn(&dev->dev,
    "TX queue failure: out of memory\n");
    } else {
    dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
    dev_warn(&dev->dev,
    "Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n",
    capacity);
    }
    }
    dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
    kfree_skb(skb);
    return NETDEV_TX_OK;
    }
    virtqueue_kick(vi->svq);

    So I'm not applying this patch (nor the virtqueue_get_capacity
    predeccessor) for the moment.

    Thanks,
    Rusty.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-21 04:37    [W:0.021 / U:64.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site