Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 May 2011 10:44:42 -0700 | From | Josh Triplett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/86] rcu: fix boost-tracing bug and update tracing documentation |
| |
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:33:01AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:43:10AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Also, does rcu/rcutorture appear with rcutorture not loaded? Hopefully > > not, since rcutorture shouldn't take up any additional resources when > > not loaded. > > Not much choice, unfortunately. If I put the info into rcutorture, then > I lose it when rcutorture is unloaded. This is problematic in automated > tests that repeatedly load and unload rcutorture. > > But the amount of data is small, and I set things up so that TINY_RCU > can omit this. TREE_RCU is big enough that it doesn't really matter.
You could omit it entirely if CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=n (rather than =m).
- Josh Triplett
| |