lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] blkdev: honor discard_granularity in blkdev_issue_discard()
Date
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> writes:

>>>>>> "Lukas" == Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Lukas> As Jeff Moyer pointed out we do not honor discard granularity
> Lukas> while submitting REQ_DISCARD bios of size smaller than
> Lukas> max_discard_sectors. That fact might have unwanted consequences
> Lukas> of device ignoring the request, or even worse if device firmware
> Lukas> is buggy.
>
> We've discussed this before and the consensus was not to do it. The
> granularity is a hint, not a hard limit like max_discard_sectors.
>
> We want the reporting to be comprehensive throughout the block layer. If
> we start aligning to the granularity at the top we lose information for
> stacked devices below with a finer granularity.
>
> So if we were to align to the granularity we'd want to do it at the
> bottom of the stack when we issue the command to the device. We've had a
> few proposed patches to did that but so far we've only found one device
> where it made a difference. And that case didn't justify adding a quirk.

Hm, I wonder where it makes sense to document this. Maybe
Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt, but I admit I wouldn't have looked
there while reviewing this code.

Cheers,
Jeff


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-02 18:13    [W:0.067 / U:0.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site