Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 15:50:43 -0500 | Subject | Re: PCI BAR1 Unassigned | From | Xianghua Xiao <> |
| |
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Jan Zwiegers <jan@radicalsystems.co.za> wrote: > On 2011-05-19 08:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jan Zwiegers<jan@radicalsystems.co.za> >> wrote: >>> >>> I have the problem below where my PCI card's second BAR does not get >>> assigned. >>> What can be the cause of this problem? >>> The last kernel I tested on which worked OK was 2.6.27. >>> My current problematic kernel 2.6.35. >>> >>> 05:01.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Eagle Technology PCI-703 Analog I/O Card >>> (rev 5c) >>> Flags: bus master, slow devsel, latency 32, IRQ 22 >>> Memory at 93b00000 (type 3, prefetchable) [size=2K] >>> Memory at<unassigned> (type 3, prefetchable) >>> Capabilities: [80] #00 [0600] >>> Kernel modules: pci703drv >> >> Could be resource exhaustion or, more likely, we ran out because we >> now assign resource to things that don't need them, leaving none for >> things that *do* need them. This sounds like a regression, so we >> should open a bugzilla for it and attach dmesg logs from 2.6.27 and >> 2.6.35. >> >> Does this problem keep the driver from working? (Sometimes drivers >> don't actually use all the BARs a device supports.) >> >> Bjorn >> > > I'm the maintainer of the driver and was involved in the development of the > board as well in 2003. The board uses two BARS and the second BAR is the > most important. The board worked fine since the 2.4 days and only recently > became problematic. I suspect it works on even later kernels than 27, maybe > 2.6.32. > > My knowledge is too little to actually determine if the problem is because > the FPGA based PCI interface is not within spec or something that changed in > the kernel, because of the post .30 releases becoming more strict to PCI > specification, i.e. BIOS / Kernel interaction. > > Jan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
What's the size for BAR1? one reason is that no more space to align/allocate BAR1.
If the board stays the same then your FPGA might be the cause, I have seen similar issues and they ended up in FPGA implementation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |