Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 May 2011 22:48:05 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation |
| |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 21:48:11 +0200 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > Dunno, %ptc ties into lowlevel sprintf() and takes a spinlock! > > yup, that's a problem.
If the lock is removed it looks useful.
> > Oh, out of morbid curiosity, mind providing a log of bigger past incidents > > where you had to stick pins into a doll of me? (In private mail, if the list is > > too long ;-) > > http://0.tqn.com/d/urbanlegends/1/0/m/B/porcupine2.jpg
That looks manageable! I was hoping not to end up like this:
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00675/china_needle404_675809c.jpg
Thanks,
Ingo
| |