lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
    On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:56:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
    >
    > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > >
    > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > > > > maintainers (and not assume lack of ack after 24 hours means acceptance), or
    > > > >
    > > > > Wrong, 72 to 96 hours. Sunday to Wednesday/Thursday.
    > > >
    > > > Not that this is really material (the argument is pretty much the same even had
    > > > you waited 3 days), but you are already wrong about the 'Sunday' part, because
    > > > you posted it to lkml on *Monday* 13:27 GMT:
    > > >
    > > > Message-ID: <20110509132738.GB16919@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
    > > > Mon, 9 May 2011 09:27:52 -0400
    > >
    > > Sigh. So you're only looking at the _second_ posting of them, not the first.
    > >
    > > Here's the message, minus the patch.
    > >
    > > | Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:24:07 +0100
    > > | From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
    > > | To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
    > > | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
    > > | Subject: i8253 clocksource consolidation
    > > | Message-ID: <20110508182407.GN27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
    > > |
    > > | Ralf, John, Ingo, hpa,
    >
    > I did not get that mail, at all. It's not in my spam mbox either.
    >
    > This pretty much explains why you assumed us informed and should explain to you
    > why i was surprised by your way of handling the patch :-)

    I never got a bounce either. Here's my outgoing MTA log lines for that
    message:

    2011-05-08 19:24:10 1QJ8eH-0004Rc-GR <= linux@arm.linux.org.uk
    H=n2100.arm.linux.org.uk [2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]
    I=[2002:4e20:1eda:1:a00:2bff:fe95:1d7b]:25 P=esmtpsa
    X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 A=cram:n2100.arm.linux.org.uk S=16326
    id=20110508182407.GN27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk
    T="i8253 clocksource consolidation" for ralf@linux-mips.org
    johnstul@us.ibm.com hpa@zytor.com mingo@redhat.com
    2011-05-08 19:24:54 1QJ8eH-0004Rc-GR => mingo@redhat.com R=verp_dnslookup
    T=verp_smtp S=16866 H=mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28] C="250 2.0.0
    p48IOnv1008509 Message accepted for delivery"

    So, mx1.redhat.com accepted it... In theory, whoever has access to
    mx1.redhat.com's logs should be able to trace what happened to the
    message...


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-17 20:31    [W:0.021 / U:34.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site