lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree

    * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

    > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >
    > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
    > >
    > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > > > maintainers (and not assume lack of ack after 24 hours means acceptance), or
    > > >
    > > > Wrong, 72 to 96 hours. Sunday to Wednesday/Thursday.
    > >
    > > Not that this is really material (the argument is pretty much the same even had
    > > you waited 3 days), but you are already wrong about the 'Sunday' part, because
    > > you posted it to lkml on *Monday* 13:27 GMT:
    > >
    > > Message-ID: <20110509132738.GB16919@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
    > > Mon, 9 May 2011 09:27:52 -0400
    >
    > Sigh. So you're only looking at the _second_ posting of them, not the first.
    >
    > Here's the message, minus the patch.
    >
    > | Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:24:07 +0100
    > | From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
    > | To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
    > | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
    > | Subject: i8253 clocksource consolidation
    > | Message-ID: <20110508182407.GN27807@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
    > |
    > | Ralf, John, Ingo, hpa,

    I did not get that mail, at all. It's not in my spam mbox either.

    This pretty much explains why you assumed us informed and should explain to you
    why i was surprised by your way of handling the patch :-)

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-17 13:59    [W:0.025 / U:31.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site