Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 May 2011 20:47:24 -0400 | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] isci merge candidate | From | Jeff Garzik <> |
| |
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > At a minimum It would require a more verbose interface to > libsas/libata (or new libframe?) to allow us to deliver raw > unsolicited frames into common protocol handlers.
...which is where SAS and SATA have been heading for a while, anyway. With chained SAS expander setup you have a network, if an annoying, manually configured and routed one. Over that network you deliver frames of various types.
Jeff
| |